> They should be forced to divest Chrome entirely Also AMPs are finally walking towards the sunset - thanks to legislations too! And look at that, EU laws are coincidentally the subjects of this article. They *can* block Google's efforts and managed to do so in the past (e.g., cohorts, web bundles, etc.). It's true that Google is a major force in developing web standards, but it's also true that Apple is. > Google only got that shit approved because they essentially control web standards at this point. It's just like web push notifications and basically all of the new web APIs. It also needs to be on a secure connection (say https). That is incorrect: permission to use Bluetooth must be given on a domain basis. > For apps you can give them rights to access bluetooth on a case by case basis, but as a single "app" the browser is all or nothing. They should be forced to divest Chrome entirely, allowing the world's biggest advertiser full control of a direct line to every web interaction that the majority of world's phone/PC users do is ridiculous! All browsers should be designed with protecting user privacy as a primary goal, but with Chrome it is the opposite! Google only got that shit approved because they essentially control web standards at this point. For apps you can give them rights to access bluetooth on a case by case basis, but as a single "app" the browser is all or nothing.Īpple should do a better job keeping up with standards for harmless stuff like CSS, but I support them 100% in refusing to implement Google's stupid standards that allow Chrome direct access to all your various bits of phone or PC hardware. Apple doesn't want to allow stuff like bluetooth to be accessible via browser, but not to protect profits but to protect users. Re: If they are attacking Apple for not allowing Chrome
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |